👤

COOPER MICHAEL S &

Property Owner — Parcel Records

16Parcels on Record
11Total Acres
$275,350Total Assessed Value
11States
13Counties

Parcels Owned by COOPER MICHAEL S & (16 records)

AddressOwner Name (on record)County / StateParcel IDAcreageMarket Value
1975 COLBERT AVE NWCOOPER MICHAEL S &Wright County, MN2030002712025.70 ac †—
(no address)COOPER MICHAEL SMesa County, CO2945162000671.01 ac—
(no address)COOPER MICHAEL S &Wright County, MN2030002243010.88 ac †—
(no address)COOPER MICHAEL SMesa County, CO2697134004390.73 ac—
2708 PLATO PLCOOPER MICHAEL SJefferson County, MO23-2.1-03.0-2-007-095.0.40 ac †—
502 502 OTTMAN STCOOPER MICHAEL SRay County, MO10-09-30-04-002-011.0000.31 ac—
760 E SILVER CREEK DRCOOPER MICHAEL SMohave County, AZR343263740.30 ac †—
3707 DODSON AVE, Kansas City, KS 66106COOPER, MICHAEL S.Wyandotte County, KS10506931010040340000.24 ac †—
(no address)COOPER MICHAEL SKent County, MI41-17-11-477-0270.22 ac—
4350 W DENO DRCOOPER, MICHAEL S &Salt Lake County, UT210625402700000.19 ac †—
(no address)COOPER MICHAEL SMesa County, CO2943091840290.18 ac—
305 FORESTWAY DR, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062COOPER MICHAEL SCook County, IL04-12-306-029-00000.18 ac †—
41 ST LAWRENCE DRCOOPER MICHAEL SSt Louis County, MO23R5208760.17 ac †—
1578 PARISH WAYMYRTLE BEACH SC 29577COOPER MICHAEL SHorry County, SC447050201100.15 ac$275,350
(no address)COOPER, MICHAEL SMontgomery County, TX0029-00-029080.12 ac—
8633 KENOSHA CTCOOPER MICHAEL S,Fairfax County, VA0983 05 0041A0.03 ac †—

About These Records

This page shows parcel records associated with the owner name COOPER MICHAEL S & in the LandBrief database: 16 parcels across 13 counties in 11 states. Records are sourced from county appraisal districts and may include residential, commercial, agricultural, and vacant land parcels.

Properties listed here are in MN, CO, MO, AZ, KS, MI, UT, IL, SC, TX, VA. Data is updated periodically from official county assessor records.

Owner names are recorded as they appear in public appraisal district data. Variations in spelling or formatting may cause some properties to appear on separate owner pages.