JACKSON ROBERT ETAL
Property Owner — Parcel Records
13Parcels on Record
16Total Acres
$43,430Total Assessed Value
7States
11Counties
Parcels Owned by JACKSON ROBERT ETAL (13 records)
| Address | Owner Name (on record) | County / State | Parcel ID | Acreage | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (no address) | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Florence County, SC | 55 | 4.43 ac † | — |
| (no address) | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Muskogee County, OK | 510032983 | 2.22 ac † | — |
| (no address) | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Muskogee County, OK | 510049323 | 2.05 ac † | — |
| 1595 GAUNTT RD | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Muskogee County, OK | 510044747 | 2.02 ac † | — |
| 42500 STETSON CT | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Madera County, CA | 093160031000 | 1.64 ac | — |
| (no address) | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Tangipahoa Parish, LA | 39T6R70000313 | 1.27 ac † | — |
| (no address) | JACKSON, ROBERT ETAL | Baker County, OR | 11S43E28B01200 | 0.80 ac | — |
| 14243 E MAIN ST | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Noxubee County, MS | 150D-17-060.00 | 0.76 ac † | $37,400 |
| (no address) | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Horry County, SC | 32807030028 | 0.35 ac † | — |
| N/S W. MAIN ST | JACKSON, ROBERT, ETAL | Amite County, MS | 32 8343421500500 | 0.24 ac † | $6,030 |
| 452 STONE HOLLOW DR | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Richland County, SC | R04104-03-42 | 0.21 ac | — |
| 1526 THURMOND RD | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Fayette County, WV | 02 38K004300000000 | 0.16 ac | — |
| 161 HALIFAX CIR | JACKSON ROBERT ETAL | Orangeburg County, SC | 0173-16-05-015.000 | 0.15 ac | — |
About These Records
This page shows parcel records associated with the owner name JACKSON ROBERT ETAL in the LandBrief database: 13 parcels across 11 counties in 7 states. Records are sourced from county appraisal districts and may include residential, commercial, agricultural, and vacant land parcels.
Properties listed here are in SC, OK, CA, LA, OR, MS, WV. Data is updated periodically from official county assessor records.
Owner names are recorded as they appear in public appraisal district data. Variations in spelling or formatting may cause some properties to appear on separate owner pages.